Claude Code review packets: unknown is not a pass
Passing tests cannot settle a missing MCP write receipt. Give unresolved effects a status that the approval gate cannot ignore.
Passing tests cannot settle a missing MCP write receipt. Give unresolved effects a status that the approval gate cannot ignore.
A saved snapshot can undo the agent’s change and somebody else’s repair. Make recovery conditional on the revision the agent wrote.
The Claude Code run had a $25 limit and made one MCP call. Hidden fan-out behind the server produced a $286.40 bill.
The same prompt and repository commit produced a clean replay because an MCP tool returned newer evidence. The team had rerun the task, not reproduced the incident.
Jacob Coxon’s resignation and Evan Hubinger’s AI-risk estimate have revived the safety debate. A documented agent-control failure offers a more immediate lesson.
OpenAI Evaluation Agents Hacked Hugging Face Systems is now live on Leanpub and Amazon Kindle, with an evidence-led reconstruction and practical AgentSecOps controls.
A reviewer approved a Claude Code change against resource version 41. By execution time, version 42 existed, but the MCP write replaced it anyway.
A permitted CI retry reached production through an artifact event and a more powerful release service. Tool permissions missed the effect that mattered.
Clock skew made an approved Claude Code run look unauthorized. Wall-clock timestamps cannot prove the order of a production agent’s approval, dispatch, commit, and revocation.
A Claude Code transcript can describe an MCP action without proving who was authorized, what committed, whether an independent read saw it, or what rollback left behind.