<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Productionai on Thomas Talks AI</title>
    <link>https://www.thomasdevos.com/tags/productionai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Productionai on Thomas Talks AI</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.145.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Thomas De Vos ©</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:20:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.thomasdevos.com/tags/productionai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Claude Code Is Not the Product: The Production Loop Is</title>
      <link>https://www.thomasdevos.com/posts/2026-04-25.21.20.00-claude-code-is-not-the-product-the-production-loop-is/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.thomasdevos.com/posts/2026-04-25.21.20.00-claude-code-is-not-the-product-the-production-loop-is/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A Claude Code demo is easy to love.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You describe a feature, the agent edits files, runs commands, fixes its own mistakes, and suddenly the repository has moved. The first time you see it work, it feels like software engineering has skipped a generation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the demo is not the hard part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hard part is making that same capability safe enough, repeatable enough, and observable enough that you would trust it inside a real engineering workflow. That is where the actual product begins.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
